| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
yuliya

Joined: 24 Apr 2008 Posts: 354 Location: Saint Petersburg, Russia
|
Posted: Thu Apr 24, 2008 2:42 pm Post subject: Calcium supplements |
|
|
What are the advantages (if any) and risks (if any) of taking calcium supplements? What would be a sensible daily dosage for most people? Who needs to take them? Our company doesn't offer one, but should I use them anyway? _________________ Yuliya
Don't forget this url because it's my new blog
My special website for affiliate marketing ...  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jana

Joined: 24 Apr 2008 Posts: 666 Location: London/Moscow
|
Posted: Sun Apr 27, 2008 3:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
It really depends what you eat. Apart from (obviously) dairy products, foods with reasonable quantities of calcium include broccoli, bok choy (Chinese cabbage), figs, turnips, mustard, salmon, and sardines with bones. For people not avoiding dairy products, this really isn't much of an issue, overall ...
The great advantage of calcium supplementation is that it's a way of reducing the risk-factors for osteoporosis, of which the incidence is increasing annually with the average age of the population ("aging baby-boomers"). Osteoporosis seems to be both more common and more significant in older women, because of the post-menopausal propensity for fractures, especially among those who haven't used hormone replacement therapy.
The widely accepted figures seem to be that people should have around 1,000 to 1,200mg of dietary calcium per day (and arguably 1,500mg for pregnant and lactating women aged under 20). The body typically absorbs only about 25%/30% of its dietary Calcium, and these figures allow for that. Its absorption is significantly increased by dietary acidity (this is well observed and proven, though far from straightforward to understand), and for this reason calcium deficiency and its risks are far more common among people trying to eat "alkaline diets". As I remember, caffeine can also reduce calcium absorption a little bit, and this can be an issue in patients - especially post-menopausal women - with enormous daily caffeine intake.
A "new" form of dietary calcium, calcium citrate malate, combines high aqueous solubility with high bioavailability (in English: you can get it into foods easily and absorb it easily too) - at least a third greater than the normal calcium carbonate (this citrate malate is the form of Calcium that's in Tropicana Pure Premium orange juice, if anyone's interested).
In the UK, pharmacists are officially advised to advise customers to take a maximum of 500mg of calcium at a time to maximize absorption and to avoid complictions and problems.
Calcium absorption is significantly increased in an acidic environment, so tablets should be taken with meals.
The risks of taking too much Calcium (2,000mg is "too much") include ...
- increased risk of developing kidney stones (unsurprisingly)
- increased risk of developing "milk alkali syndrome" (I think this is probably only ever an issue for people whose total daily dietary intake is around 2,000mg or more)
- interference with iron absorption (and therefore anemia)
- constipation
- lead toxicity (because some sources of calcium have lead contamination - this can apply to almost any calcium, but seems to be a particular problem of so-called "natural calcium" much of which is derived from oyster-shells. In America, the FDA has issued warnings about calcium supplements being taken by children for this reason).
In summary, nobody eating reasonably healthily should ever need more than 500mg per day as a supplement, I think, and might well not need any at all. As with many other nutrients, it's very easy to take far too much by taking several different mineral/vitamin supplements all of which may, without you realising it, contain calcium ...
In my opinion, calcium supplementation is not necessary for the great majority of the population, and "coral calcium", in particular, should be treated with a very great deal of skepticism ...  _________________ Jana
Scientists stop the aging process
"Oxidative stress" may be an effect of aging rather than a cause |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jamie

Joined: 25 Apr 2008 Posts: 434 Location: The outer limits of my insane mind
|
Posted: Sun Apr 27, 2008 3:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I couldn't be more confused if I tried.... is milk not enough anymore??
LOL..
Thanks
Jamie _________________ I have neither the time nor the inclination to insult you with the plethora of reasons why YOU need to Bust Your Limiting Beliefs...
Your limiting beliefs make you look pathetic, narrow minded, and cynical... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Loren Woirhaye

Joined: 26 Apr 2008 Posts: 3 Location: Los Angeles California
|
Posted: Sun Apr 27, 2008 3:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
deleted
Last edited by Loren Woirhaye on Mon Apr 28, 2008 12:53 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
timothy Site Admin

Joined: 20 Apr 2008 Posts: 31 Location: West Yorkshire, UK
|
Posted: Sun Apr 27, 2008 6:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Jamie wrote: |
| I couldn't be more confused if I tried.... is milk not enough anymore?? |
It is for most people. The potential problem arises mostly when you add together in the same person a few different osteoporotic risk-factors, of which the main ones are being female and avoiding all dairy produce (which a lot of people do, these days, especially people with any tendency towards asthma).
If he'll excuse me, I can't quite agree with Loren about acidity. Though I don't have any evidence at my fingertips, it's very well proven and documented in medical and nutritional circles that acidity boosts calcium absorption. So much so that it's in the light of this well-known finding that people are routinely advised to take their calcium supplement (if any) with food - in contrast to almost all other supplements which are of course far more effectively absorbed on an empty stomach.
The issue over calcium and magnesium is also basically the same as what Jana wisely mentioned above about the relation between calcium absorption and iron absorption. This bit isn't actually difficult to understand at all. The point here is simply that these three (calcium, magnesium and iron) are all divalent ions in solution (they carry a "2+" charge, i.e. lacking two electrons to revert to their atomic state) and therefore they compete for absorption. So just as taking too much calcium can eventually lead to an iron deficiency anaemia (excuse the English spelling) because the presence of calcium reduces iron absorption, similarly taking magnesium with calcium definitely reduces the absorption of the calcium. I'm not suggesting that nobody should take both, but taking the two together must clearly reduce the absorption of each. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jana

Joined: 24 Apr 2008 Posts: 666 Location: London/Moscow
|
Posted: Sun Apr 27, 2008 7:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| timothy wrote: |
| just as taking too much calcium can eventually lead to an iron deficiency anaemia (excuse the English spelling) because the presence of calcium reduces iron absorption, similarly taking magnesium with calcium definitely reduces the absorption of the calcium. I'm not suggesting that nobody should take both, but taking the two together must clearly reduce the absorption of each. |
This is for sure. In outcome (though the mechanism in this case clearly isn't one of absorption per se), it reminds me of these yogurt-based products you see, that contain live cultures of both Acidophilus and Bifidus. Both perfectly good things to take, in their own right, but the Bifidus won't actually do you much good if you swallow it with the Acidophilus ... it's a long way to the colon from the stomach! ...  _________________ Jana
Scientists stop the aging process
"Oxidative stress" may be an effect of aging rather than a cause |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
wolfeagle

Joined: 25 Apr 2008 Posts: 5 Location: United States
|
Posted: Mon Apr 28, 2008 9:58 am Post subject: Re: Calcium supplements |
|
|
Hello Yuliya,
In a perfect world we would ideally receive our nutritents from fresh, healthy foods. However in the city suburbs of america in our chemically polluted and stress filled lives, nutritional requirements have been increasing.
Furthermore buying a natural vitamin in a store front does not guarantee that the vitamin was extracted or derived from food sources.
With Calcium if you read the supplemental ingredients at a store front the first ingredient is sugar and some do not even have the correct synergy to utilize the calcium.
The amino acid lysine is needed for calcium absorption and if calcium is taken with iron they cancel each other out by interfering with absorption.
The best suggestion for taking calcium is in small doses through out the day and no more than 500 mg is recommended at one time for the average adult.
There are so many benefits to supplementing calcium. Such as sounder sleep, lowering blood pressure and healthy skin, hair, bones, teeth,nails,exzema, cramps, insominia, and mental cognitive abilities.
Calcium and magnesium are the correct synergy.
1500 to 2000 mg of calcium daily is suggested for the healthy
adult. Again not all at once but in smailler doses throughout the day.
I believe the max is 2500 mg per day but this could be out dated.
Salt, soft drinks, junk foods leads to an increased excretion of calcium.
Foods w calcium other than dairy are seafood, dark green leafy veggies, prunes, blackstrap molasses which is also high in iron so they sorta do not work synergy wise. sesame seeds, almonds, tofu, soy, and also herbs too. yarrow, lemongrass, fenugreek, flaxseed, hops, horsetail, cayenne, chamomile, alfalfa, just a few I am aware of.
Therefore a scrambled egg which has the amino acid lysine and a glass of milk is a good source of food for calcium.
Isagenix has a water soluable calcium powder called
Isa Cal and taste like strawberrys and cream.
It is wonderful and taste great mixed with water, juice,
or even in a protein shake.
The formula allows for easy absorption and
higher bioavailabilty.
Furthermore, it has bamboo, horsetail etc,.
allowing the body to create its own silica.
The risk with calcium is if you have kidney disease and you eat
to many almonds, soy beans, spinach etc, or if you are on prescribed medications that are a calcium channel blocker. I am sure there
are many factors to consider and always consult your doctor if in doubt.
Hope this helps,
Warmly
Christina
| yuliya wrote: |
| What are the advantages (if any) and risks (if any) of taking calcium supplements? What would be a sensible daily dosage for most people? Who needs to take them? Our company doesn't offer one, but should I use them anyway? |
_________________ Visit A to Z work from home! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
yuliya

Joined: 24 Apr 2008 Posts: 354 Location: Saint Petersburg, Russia
|
Posted: Mon Apr 28, 2008 11:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks very much for all your replies. I got a lot more information here than out of my brother who is a surgeon! I think I won't take it, then, actually. I drink milk and eat broccoli, and cheese. (And of course I sell both Acidophilus and Bifidus and recommend to customers to take Acidophilus in the morning and Bifidus in the evening, as all our distributors do!). _________________ Yuliya
Don't forget this url because it's my new blog
My special website for affiliate marketing ...  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
racquetball4ever

Joined: 29 Apr 2008 Posts: 369 Location: Indiana
|
Posted: Wed Apr 30, 2008 4:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
I was under the impression that coral calcium was a good thing to take daily. I will have to look into that further.
We actually sell it at our pro shop.
Manny _________________ Growing An Industry
www.squidoo.com/racquetballcrusade
For All Your Racquet Needs:
www.lawlersports.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jana

Joined: 24 Apr 2008 Posts: 666 Location: London/Moscow
|
Posted: Wed Apr 30, 2008 3:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The problem with coral calcium, I think (as with some other supplements) is that if you discount "incentivized information" provided by people selling/promoting it, it becomes very difficult to do your own research ...
That said, there's certainly plenty of factual and indisputable information here: http://www.quackwatch.org/01QuackeryRelatedTopics/DSH/coral.html
Michael Murray, a great proponent of natural medicine and natural supplements, gives his views on Coral Calcium here: http://www.doctormurray.com/articles/CoralCalcium.htm
There's an article from Time magazine here: http://www.time.com/time/columnist/jaroff/article/0,9565,433084,00.html
There are some details of an FTC ruling here: http://www.ftc.gov/opa/2004/01/barefoot.shtm
Natural health writer Rusty Ford gives his view here: http://health.learninginfo.org/coral-calcium.htm
The HealthSavers.info site (often a good resource for information) has some explanatory stuff here: http://www.healthsavers.info/CoralCal.htm
Many people believe that excessive calcium, far from preventing osteoporosis, can actually cause it - some views here: http://www.4.waisays.com/ExcessiveCalcium.htm
There's also quite a lot of information about coral calcium being the form of calcium likely to contain the highest proportion of lead contamination (cannot immediately produce a reference for this, but will dig something out at some point!). _________________ Jana
Scientists stop the aging process
"Oxidative stress" may be an effect of aging rather than a cause |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
| |